Retrofit Credits Service
London Borough of Hammersmith and FuhamEstimated Value
Up to £562,500
Deadline
Not specified
Published
7 May 2025
Type
Not specified
Full Description
Summary
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Council (the “Council”) is publishing this Preliminary Market Engagement (PME) notice to understand whether there are any organisations in the market, capable of supplying the Council with a “retrofit credits” service: a type of carbon credit for retrofitting social homes. This service would provide the Council with a source of income from selling retrofit credits to buyers of carbon credits.
Background
The Council manages around 17,000 homes and has a target for the borough and the assets under the Council’s control to achieve net zero. This requires retrofitting these homes with energy efficiency measures and low-carbon heating at scale; a mission not fully covered by existing council budgets or government grant funding.
The Council therefore wishes to understand what alternative sources of funding may be available.
This PME seeks responses from suppliers of “retrofit credits”, a form of carbon credit, to understand how well developed the market for these is.
Outline of the Service Being Sought
The service would aim to unlock investment in social housing retrofit projects by verifying emission reductions and social value from these projects and creating carbon credits backed by these reductions to be sold to investors. This service would enable the Council to access funding for retrofit activities that improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions, whilst also generating social value for residents and communities.
Expected Benefits of this Service
Reducing Council Costs of Delivering Retrofit – Generates additional income through the sale of credits, making retrofit projects more economically viable.
Accelerating Delivery of Energy Efficiency – By subsidising the cost of delivery, more homes can be reached, and the Council’s aims around fuel poverty and net zero can be attained sooner.
Social Value and Wider Business Case – As the programmes improve the wellbeing of residents by creating warmer, healthier homes, more of this positive impact is measured and captured through, presenting a stronger business case for investment.
Local Sustainable Economic Partnership – Stimulates demand for green technologies and services locally and fosters relationships with local businesses who may become buyers of the Council’s retrofit credits.
Key Requirements for a Retrofit Credit Service
Accreditation – The service must be accredited under a high-quality carbon standard e.g. the Verified Carbon Standard, or similar level of accreditation.
Specific to Housing Retrofit Projects – The credits must be tailored to housing retrofit projects and measures that improve energy efficiency, and encompass a wide range of housing interventions that reduce energy use and carbon emissions. For instance, these should include any measures that increase the fabric thermal efficiency of a building and replacement of heating systems, lighting and other fixed hardware that reduce energy use.
Reporting and Verification of Projects – The reporting and verification process must be sufficiently simple and non-resource-intensive for Councils, ideally following the kinds of data and certification already required for reporting to government for grant-funded schemes. Data requirements and certification of schemes should not be onerous and should require the minimum input needed to be robust.
Backdating of projects: The service should if possible allow the council to submit projects already undertaken in the past as credits, dating back to the origin of the service’s accreditation.
Emission Reduction Calculation – The credits must follow a valid and well-established methodology to calculate potential emission reductions and projected funding from projects.
Social Value Assessment – The credits must measure the social value generated by retrofit works using a valid and well-established methodology.
Management of Sales Process – The sale of credits is to be managed by the supplier, with only reporting and certification of projects a responsibility of the Council. The supplier must ensure all compliance with standards and regulations are met.
Vetting of Buyers – The supplier must manage the sale of these credits to pre-registered buyers. Buyers must be vetted to ensure they show commitment to reducing their own emissions in line with the Paris Climate Agreement, to avoid the risk of credits being used as an “easy” way to claim carbon neutrality instead of reducing emissions directly. There must be a due diligence framework for all buyers allowing the Council to conduct its own due diligence and engage only those buyers who meet its procurement and ethical standards. Credits must only be sold bilaterally to vetted buyers through the supplier’s platform and not be sold on through the open market. Being able to identify buyers local to the borough or region with whom the Council can develop a longer-term relationship would be advantageous.
Value of Credits – The price of credits needs to be sufficient to incentivise the Council to undertake additional retrofit works.
Flexibility – The service must offer flexibility for the Council to switch to an alternative carbon credit supplier, if a more competitive offer becomes available, to retire credits from the scheme for future years, and to retain credits for our own use if desired. The service should be flexible to the number of projects the council can offer and not tie the council into delivering a set number of measures within a given period.
Compatibility with Other Funding Sources – The service must ensure compatibility with the Warm Homes: Social Housing Fund and other sources of grant and investor funding, so that credits can be used as co-funding to meet the balance of eligible expenditure not supported by grants.
Requirements
Accreditation – The service must be accredited under a high-quality carbon standard e.g. the Verified Carbon Standard, or similar level of accreditation.
Specific to Housing Retrofit Projects – The credits must be tailored to housing retrofit projects and measures that improve energy efficiency, and encompass a wide range of housing interventions that reduce energy use and carbon emissions. For instance, these should include any measures that increase the fabric thermal efficiency of a building and replacement of heating systems, lighting and other fixed hardware that reduce energy use.
Reporting and Verification of Projects – The reporting and verification process must be sufficiently simple and non-resource-intensive for Councils, ideally following the kinds of data and certification already required for reporting to government for grant-funded schemes. Data requirements and certification of schemes should not be onerous and should require the minimum input needed to be robust.
Emission Reduction Calculation – The credits must follow a valid and well-established methodology to calculate potential emission reductions and projected funding from projects.
Social Value Assessment – The credits must measure the social value generated by retrofit works using a valid and well-established methodology.
Management of Sales Process – The sale of credits is to be managed by the supplier, with only reporting and certification of projects a responsibility of the Council. The supplier must ensure all compliance with standards and regulations are met.
Vetting of Buyers – The supplier must manage the sale of these credits to pre-registered buyers. Buyers must be vetted to ensure they show commitment to reducing their own emissions in line with the Paris Climate Agreement, to avoid the risk of credits being used as an “easy” way to claim carbon neutrality instead of reducing emissions directly. There must be a due diligence framework for all buyers allowing the Council to conduct its own due diligence and engage only those buyers who meet its procurement and ethical standards. Credits must only be sold bilaterally to vetted buyers through the supplier’s platform and not be sold on through the open market. Being able to identify buyers local to the borough or region with whom the Council can develop a longer-term relationship would be advantageous.
Flexibility – The service must offer flexibility for the Council to switch to an alternative carbon credit supplier, if a more competitive offer becomes available, to retire credits from the scheme for future years, and to retain credits for our own use if desired. The service should be flexible to the number of projects the council can offer and not tie the council into delivering a set number of measures within a given period.
Compatibility with Other Funding Sources – The service must ensure compatibility with the Warm Homes: Social Housing Fund and other sources of grant and investor funding, so that credits can be used as co-funding to meet the balance of eligible expenditure not supported by grants.
AI AnalysisMembers
Requirements, key tasks and tips for reading this tender — included with Tendarix membership.
£4.99/month after a 7-day free trial. Cancel anytime before it ends and you pay nothing.
Likely incumbents
Suppliers who won similar work from this buyer in the last 5 years.
- 1
Hubbub foundation UK
- 2
Sutcliffe Play
2 contracts wonlatest 22 Jan 2026 - 3
Idox Software Ltd
- 4
London Borough of Harrow
1 contract wonlatest 13 Aug 2026ends 31 Jul 2026 - 5
CoStar UK Ltd
Hubbub foundation UK is the most likely incumbent based on recency and category match. To win, bidders typically need a clearly differentiated proposition or a price advantage.
Before you bid, buyers check
two years of filed accountsyour financial standingturnover vs contract valueyour Companies House recordcash flow for 30-day termscredit scores and ratios
Actions
Start free trialto open noticeCreate an account and start a 7-day free trial to open the buyer’s own notice and tender documents, plus fit scoring and the Bid Writer. Then £4.99/month — cancel anytime.
Open Bid WriterIndependent software, web & cloud studio. We design, build and grow digital products that quietly outlast their category.
How to Apply
Step-by-step submission guide
Submission Portal
Find a Tender
Open the original notice
Click the button below to view the full notice on Find a Tender Service (FTS)
Check the procedure type
The "Procedure" section tells you if it's Open (one stage) or Restricted (SQ then ITT). This changes how you apply
Access the eSourcing portal
FTS notices link to the buyer's eSourcing platform — register there to access documents
Complete the Selection Questionnaire
Higher-value contracts often require an SQ first — this pre-qualifies you before the full bid stage
Submit electronically
Upload your completed response through the eSourcing platform before the closing date and time
FTS contracts are above UK procurement thresholds. Late submissions are strictly rejected — submit at least 24 hours before the deadline to avoid portal issues.
Buyer Profile
London Borough of Hammersmith and FuhamKey Dates
Published
7 May 2025
Submission deadline
Not specified
Notice type
planningUpdate
Source
find a tender
Related Tenders
Provision of aerial survey of the UK rail network - lidar (light detection and ranging) and aerial photography
Network Rail require an Aerial Survey of the UK rail network, principally consisting of LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and RGB (Red, Green and Blue) data capture. There is a d
Hackney publication - print and distribution contract
A Hackney Publication - Print and Distribution Contract. The contract will run for a maximum period of three years (2 years + 1 year) and is split into 2 lots: Lot 1 - Print Lot 2
Community and maternity champions services for RBKC & WCC
This is the re-procurement of the Earl’s Court Community Champions service on behalf of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, and the Maternity Champions services on behalf
Notice of intention to award under the public health framework - live well preventative health services
This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 20
